From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Washington v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
May 8, 1968
210 So. 2d 290 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)

Opinion

No. 67-328.

May 8, 1968.

Appeal from the Criminal Court of Record, Hillsborough County, Walter N. Burnside, Jr., J.

Joseph G. Spicola, Jr., Public Defender, and Richard C. Edwards, Asst. Public Defender, Tampa, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and William D. Roth, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.


Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment of conviction entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of breaking and entering with intent to commit a misdemeanor. His sole contention of error is that the Assistant State Attorney, in his closing argument to the jury, improperly commented on appellant's failure to testify, thus violating Florida Statutes, Section 918.09 (1965), F.S.A.

When taken in the context of the record as a whole, the assailed statement constitutes nothing more than a comment on the evidence as it existed before the jury. As such, it was legitimate. See State v. Jones, Fla. 1967, 204 So.2d 515, 516-18; Clinton v. State, 1908, 56 Fla. 57, 61-62, 47 So. 389, 390; Gray v. State, 1900, 42 Fla. 174, 176-177, 28 So. 53-54; Woodside v. State, Fla.App. 1968, 206 So.2d 426, 428-429; cf. Gordon v. State, Fla. 1958, 104 So.2d 524, 539-541; Trafficante v. State, Fla. 1957, 92 So.2d 811, 812-814; Way v. State, Fla. 1953, 67 So.2d 321, 322. The appealed judgment is accordingly affirmed.

Affirmed.

ALLEN, Acting C.J., and PIERCE and HOBSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Washington v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
May 8, 1968
210 So. 2d 290 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)
Case details for

Washington v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOHNNIE B. WASHINGTON, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: May 8, 1968

Citations

210 So. 2d 290 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)

Citing Cases

Mathis v. State

My reading of the circumstances surrounding the prosecutor's comments in the case sub judice leads me to…

In re G.M.A.

The court may consider as abandoned any assignment of error or issue for review which has not been briefed.")…