From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Washington v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston
Apr 2, 2009
No. 01-08-00161-CR (Tex. App. Apr. 2, 2009)

Opinion

No. 01-08-00161-CR

Opinion issued April 2, 2009. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

On Appeal from the 184th District Court Harris County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. 1099755.

Panel consists of Chief Justice RADACK, and Justices ALCALA and HANKS.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Appellant, Tammy Washington, pleaded guilty to the felony offense of aggregate theft in an amount greater than $200,000 without an agreed punishment recommendation from the State. The trial court found appellant guilty and reset the case for a presentence investigation hearing. Following the hearing, the trial court sentenced appellant to confinement for 12 years. Appellant's counsel on appeal has filed a brief stating that the record presents no reversible error, that the appeal is without merit and is frivolous, and that the appeal must be dismissed or affirmed. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, (1967). The brief meets the requirements of Anders by presenting a professional evaluation of the record and detailing why there are no arguable grounds for reversal. Id. at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; see also High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 810 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978). Counsel represents that she has served a copy of the brief on appellant. Counsel also advised appellant of her right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se brief. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991). More than 30 days have passed, and appellant has not filed a pro se brief. Having reviewed the record and counsel's brief, we agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit and that there is no reversible error. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex.Crim.App. 2005). We affirm the judgment of the trial court and grant counsel's motion to withdraw. Attorney Clyde Williams must immediately send the notice required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 6.5(c) and file a copy of that notice with the Clerk of this Court.

Appointed counsel still has a duty to inform appellant of the result of this appeal and that she may, on his own, pursue discretionary review in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex.Crim.App. 2005).


Summaries of

Washington v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston
Apr 2, 2009
No. 01-08-00161-CR (Tex. App. Apr. 2, 2009)
Case details for

Washington v. State

Case Details

Full title:TAMMY WASHINGTON, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston

Date published: Apr 2, 2009

Citations

No. 01-08-00161-CR (Tex. App. Apr. 2, 2009)