From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Washington v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO
Feb 1, 2000
No. ED 75853 (Mo. Ct. App. Feb. 1, 2000)

Opinion

No. ED 75853.

OPINION FILED: February 1, 2000.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY, HONORABLE EMMETT O'BRIEN, JUDGE.

Dave Hemingway, Special Public Defender, Patricia M. Garvey, 1139 Olive, Suite 200, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.

John Munson Morris, III, Assistant Attorney General, Shaun J. Mackelprang, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102 for respondent.

Before Kathianne Knaup Crane, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J. and Sherri B. Sullivan, J.



ORDER


Gerald Lamont Washington, movant, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court's judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion, for the use of the parties only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Washington v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO
Feb 1, 2000
No. ED 75853 (Mo. Ct. App. Feb. 1, 2000)
Case details for

Washington v. State

Case Details

Full title:GERALD LAMONT WASHINGTON, MOVANT/APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO

Date published: Feb 1, 2000

Citations

No. ED 75853 (Mo. Ct. App. Feb. 1, 2000)