From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Washington v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Mar 2, 2010
304 S.W.3d 294 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010)

Opinion

No. ED92813.

March 2, 2010.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Mark H. Neill, Judge.

Gwenda R. Robinson, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Shaun J. MacKelprang, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., and PATRICIA L. COHEN, JJ.



ORDER


Pedro Washington ("Movant") appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. Movant claims his plea counsel was ineffective because he induced Movant's guilty plea by misrepresenting the maximum sentence for the charged offenses.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court's decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Washington v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Mar 2, 2010
304 S.W.3d 294 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010)
Case details for

Washington v. State

Case Details

Full title:Pedro WASHINGTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Mar 2, 2010

Citations

304 S.W.3d 294 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010)