From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Washington v. Houston

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Oct 10, 2007
4:07CV3125 (D. Neb. Oct. 10, 2007)

Opinion

4:07CV3125.

October 10, 2007


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


The plaintiff has responded to the court's order directing that a new motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP") be filed. Upon review of the record, the new motion for leave to proceed ipf (filing 23) is granted, and the plaintiff is relieved of any liability for the unpaid balance of the filing fee. See, e.g., McGann v. Comm'r, Social Security Admin., 96 F.3d 28, 30 (2d Cir. 1996) ("A released prisoner may litigate without further payment of fees upon satisfying the poverty affidavit requirement applicable to all non-prisoners.").

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED:

1. The plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (filing 23) is granted; and
2. The plaintiff is relieved of any liability for the unpaid balance of the filing fee.


Summaries of

Washington v. Houston

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Oct 10, 2007
4:07CV3125 (D. Neb. Oct. 10, 2007)
Case details for

Washington v. Houston

Case Details

Full title:Rev. DeROISE J. WASHINGTON, D.D., Petitioner, v. ROBERT HOUSTON, Director…

Court:United States District Court, D. Nebraska

Date published: Oct 10, 2007

Citations

4:07CV3125 (D. Neb. Oct. 10, 2007)