From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Washington Mutual Bank v. Banks

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Sep 26, 2007
CASE NO. 1:07CV2177 (N.D. Ohio Sep. 26, 2007)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:07CV2177.

September 26, 2007


ORDER


The Court has been advised the parties are "actively pursuing a loss mitigation resolution." Therefore, it is not necessary the action remain on the pending docket of the Court.

IT IS ORDERED this action is closed. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to vacate this Order and reopen the action upon cause shown the agreement has not been finalized, and further litigation is necessary. If a settlement is reached, the parties shall submit a dismissal entry.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Washington Mutual Bank v. Banks

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Sep 26, 2007
CASE NO. 1:07CV2177 (N.D. Ohio Sep. 26, 2007)
Case details for

Washington Mutual Bank v. Banks

Case Details

Full title:Washington Mutual Bank, etc., Plaintiff, v. Carl Banks, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Sep 26, 2007

Citations

CASE NO. 1:07CV2177 (N.D. Ohio Sep. 26, 2007)