From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Washburn v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Oct 19, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15-CV-674 (M.D. Pa. Oct. 19, 2016)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15-CV-674

10-19-2016

LYNNE H. WASHBURN, Plaintiff v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant


( ) ORDER

AND NOW, this 19th day of October, 2016, upon consideration of the report (Doc. 18) of Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn, recommending that the court vacate the decision of the administrative law judge denying the application of plaintiff Lynne H. Washburn ("Washburn") for a period of disability, disability insurance benefits, and supplemental security income, and remand the above-captioned matter for further proceedings and development of the record, wherein Judge Cohn opines that the administrative law judge's decision is not "supported by substantial evidence," 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and finds specifically that the administrative law judge erred in omitting a treating source medical opinion, (Doc. 18 at 14-17), and further erred in discounting a treating source medical opinion in favor of two non-treating, non-examining medical sources, neither of whom reviewed a complete medical record, (id. at 18-43), and it appearing that neither Washburn nor the Commissioner of Social Security ("Commissioner") objects to the report, see FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(2), and that the Commissioner expressly waived the opportunity to do so, (see Doc. 19), and the court noting that failure to timely object to a magistrate judge's conclusions "may result in forfeiture of de novo review at the district court level," Nara v. Frank, 488 F.3d 187, 194 (3d Cir. 2007) (citing Henderson v. Carlson, 812 F.2d 874, 878-79 (3d Cir. 1987)), but that, as a matter of good practice, a district court should "afford some level of review to dispositive legal issues raised by the report," Henderson, 812 F.2d at 878; see also Taylor v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 83 F. Supp. 3d 625, 626 (M.D. Pa. 2015) (citing Univac Dental Co. v. Dentsply Int'l, Inc., 702 F. Supp. 2d 465, 469 (M.D. Pa. 2010)), in order to "satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record," FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), advisory committee notes, and, following an independent review of the record, the court in agreement with Judge Cohn's recommendation, and concluding that there is no clear error on the face of the record, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The report (Doc. 18) of Magistrate Judge Cohn is ADOPTED.

2. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in favor of Washburn and against the Commissioner as set forth in the following paragraph.

3. The Commissioner's decision denying Washburn's application for a period of disability, disability insurance benefits, and supplemental security income is VACATED. This matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner with instructions to conduct a new administrative hearing, develop the record fully, and evaluate the evidence appropriately in accordance with this order and the report (Doc. 18) of Magistrate Judge Cohn.

4. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.

/S/ CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER

Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge

United States District Court

Middle District of Pennsylvania


Summaries of

Washburn v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Oct 19, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15-CV-674 (M.D. Pa. Oct. 19, 2016)
Case details for

Washburn v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:LYNNE H. WASHBURN, Plaintiff v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Oct 19, 2016

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15-CV-674 (M.D. Pa. Oct. 19, 2016)

Citing Cases

Yeager v. Berryhill

' Maellaro v. Colvin, Civ. No. 3:12-01560, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84572, 2014 WL 2770717, at *11 (M.D. Pa.…

Velikas v. Berryhill

' Maellaro v. Colvin, Civ. No. 3:12-01560, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84572, 2014 WL 2770717, at *11 (M.D. Pa.…