From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Warren v. Tolbert

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 2, 2018
No. 17-2345 (4th Cir. Apr. 2, 2018)

Opinion

No. 17-2345

04-02-2018

TINIKA S. WARREN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BRAD TOLBERT, City of Greensboro, NC; TERRI JONES; MARK WAYMAN; DONALD FOSTER, Defendants - Appellees.

Tinika S. Warren, Appellant Pro Se. John Roseboro, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, Chief District Judge. (1:16-cv-01401-TDS-JLW) Before AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tinika S. Warren, Appellant Pro Se. John Roseboro, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Tinika S. Warren appeals the district court's order dismissing her civil action challenging the City of Greensboro's condemnation of property occupied by Warren. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Warren v. Tolbert, No. 1:16-cv-01401-TDS-JLW (M.D.N.C. Nov. 17, 2017). We deny Warren's motion requesting certain documents and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Warren v. Tolbert

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 2, 2018
No. 17-2345 (4th Cir. Apr. 2, 2018)
Case details for

Warren v. Tolbert

Case Details

Full title:TINIKA S. WARREN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BRAD TOLBERT, City of…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 2, 2018

Citations

No. 17-2345 (4th Cir. Apr. 2, 2018)

Citing Cases

Ross v. Soc. Sec. Admin.

18 U.S.C. § 242, the statute under which Ross seeks relief, does not provide a private right of action. See,…

Dawkins v. Staley

., 901 F.2d 387, 391 (4th Cir. 1990); see Warren v. City of Greensboro, 280 F.Supp.3d 780, 784 (M.D. N.C.…