From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Warren v. Robinson

Supreme Court of California
Dec 7, 1886
71 Cal. 380 (Cal. 1886)

Opinion

         Department One

         Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Mateo County.

         COUNSEL:

         The general finding that all the material allegations of the complaint are fully sustained and proved is insufficient. (Cassidy v. Cassidy , 63 Cal. 352; Ladd v. Tully , 51 Cal. 277; Breeze v. Doyle , 19 Cal. 105; Harlan v. Ely , 55 Cal. 340.)

         Nygh, Fairweather & Durst, for Appellants.

          George H. Buck, and George E. Filkins, for Respondent.


         JUDGES: McKinstry, J. Myrick, J., and Thornton, J., concurred.

         OPINION

          McKINSTRY, Judge

         The complaint alleges the defendants to be husband and wife, and that the services rendered and materials furnished (the value of which is sued for) were rendered at the special instance and request of defendants, upon and furnished for a building, the separate property of the wife; that the defendants promised to pay for such services and materials.

         The court found "that all the material allegations in the plaintiff's complaint are fully sustained and proved." This is insufficient. (Cassidy v. Cassidy , 63 Cal. 352; Ladd v. Tully , 51 Cal. 277.) The finding continues: "And that said labor performed and materials furnished, as alleged in said complaint, were and are for the benefit, profit, convenience, and use of defendants, and to said house and premises, and that the charges for said labor performed and material furnished were and are reasonable and proper."

         There is no distinct finding that any labor was performed or that any materials were furnished. There is no finding that the services, etc., were rendered at the instance or request of the defendants, or either of them, or that husband or wife promised to pay therefor, or that the defendants were husband and wife, or that the services, etc., were rendered in or about the separate property of the wife, or that the house mentioned in the complaint was her separate property. Nor is there any distinct finding of the value or reasonable worth of the services rendered or materials furnished.

         Judgment reversed, and cause remanded for a new trial.


Summaries of

Warren v. Robinson

Supreme Court of California
Dec 7, 1886
71 Cal. 380 (Cal. 1886)
Case details for

Warren v. Robinson

Case Details

Full title:E. WARREN, Respondent, v. CAROLINE C. ROBINSON et al., Appellants

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Dec 7, 1886

Citations

71 Cal. 380 (Cal. 1886)
12 P. 265

Citing Cases

Kendrick v. Gould

[2] One of the grounds relied upon by appellant is that the findings are incomplete. In support of this…

Town of Winchester v. Cox

As regards property held by a municipality in its governmental capacity, the legislature may in general…