From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Warren v. Fore

United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Oxford Division
Nov 23, 2021
3:20CV220-M-RP (N.D. Miss. Nov. 23, 2021)

Opinion

3:20CV220-M-RP

11-23-2021

VIVIAN WARREN PLAINTIFF v. DANIEL B. FORE, A/K/A DANIEL B. FORE, MD DEFENDANT


ORDER

MICHAEL P. MILLS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This cause comes before the Court on Defendant's Motion in Limine [83] to preclude any reference or comparison during the trial of this cause that any medical condition the Plaintiff experienced is comparable to the COVID-19.

The Defendant argues that there is no proof or reference in any medical record or from any physician that Warren's hypoxia was in any way related to COVID-19. The Defendant further argues that making any reference, inuendo, or supposition that Warren experience COVID-19 like symptoms is misleading and unnecessary, as Warren was not diagnosed with COVID-19.

The Court finds that any reference, questioning, or comparison of Warren's conditions, or experiences, with COVID-19 has no probative value, and thus Defendant's motion in limine is GRANTED.

ACCORDINGLY, it is therefore ordered that Defendant's Motion in Limine [83] is GRANTED.

SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Warren v. Fore

United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Oxford Division
Nov 23, 2021
3:20CV220-M-RP (N.D. Miss. Nov. 23, 2021)
Case details for

Warren v. Fore

Case Details

Full title:VIVIAN WARREN PLAINTIFF v. DANIEL B. FORE, A/K/A DANIEL B. FORE, MD…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Oxford Division

Date published: Nov 23, 2021

Citations

3:20CV220-M-RP (N.D. Miss. Nov. 23, 2021)