From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Easterling v. Crawford

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Nov 19, 2015
Case No. 3:14-cv-226 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 19, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 3:14-cv-226

11-19-2015

WARREN EASTERLING, Plaintiff, v. JUDGE DALE CRAWFORD, Defendant.


DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON SECOND MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT (DOC. #40); OVERRULING PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS THERETO (DOC. #41) AND PLAINTIFF'S "MOTION FOR RELIEF OF JUDGMENT (RULE 60B)" (DOC. #39)

Based on the reasoning and citations of authority set forth by United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz in his September 23, 2015, Report and Recommendations on Second Motion for Relief from Judgment (Doc. #40), as well as on a thorough de novo review of this Court's file and the applicable law, the Court ADOPTS said judicial filing. Plaintiff's Objections thereto (Doc. #41) are OVERRULED for reasons previously explained. See Docs. ##36, 38.

Plaintiff's "Motion for Relief of Judgment (Rule 60B)" (Doc. #39) is OVERRULED. The above-captioned case shall remain terminated on this Court's docket. Date: November 19, 2015

/s/_________

WALTER H. RICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Easterling v. Crawford

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Nov 19, 2015
Case No. 3:14-cv-226 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 19, 2015)
Case details for

Easterling v. Crawford

Case Details

Full title:WARREN EASTERLING, Plaintiff, v. JUDGE DALE CRAWFORD, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 19, 2015

Citations

Case No. 3:14-cv-226 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 19, 2015)