From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Warner v. Genth

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division, at Dayton
Mar 8, 2006
Case No. 3:04CV0353 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 8, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 3:04CV0353.

March 8, 2006

GREGORY K. PRATT, Pratt Singer Papakirk, Middletown, OH, Attorney for Plaintiffs.

STEPHEN E. GILLEN, RICHARD BOYDSTON, Greenebaum Doll McDonald PLLC, Krause Publications, Inc. and F W Publications, Inc., Cincinnati, OH, Attorneys for Defendants.

JOHN S. KLUZNIK, Weston Hurd LLP, Dean A. Genth, Cleveland, Ohio, Attorney for Defendant.


STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE


The Parties, by their counsel, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure stipulate that the above-captioned matter has been settled and that the action, including the Complaint as amended and the Counterclaim, be dismissed with prejudice as to the Parties, each Party to bear its own costs, litigation expenses and attorneys fees, provided that any of the Parties may, upon good cause shown within sixty (60) days, re-open this action if settlement is not consummated.

The Parties intend to preserve this Court's jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement between the Parties, if necessary.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Warner v. Genth

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division, at Dayton
Mar 8, 2006
Case No. 3:04CV0353 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 8, 2006)
Case details for

Warner v. Genth

Case Details

Full title:JANE WARNER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DEAN A. GENTH, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division, at Dayton

Date published: Mar 8, 2006

Citations

Case No. 3:04CV0353 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 8, 2006)