From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ware v. Pruitt

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Mar 19, 2010
370 F. App'x 407 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 09-2290.

Submitted: March 16, 2010.

Decided: March 19, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (1:09-cv-02360-MBS-JRM).

Ozie M. Ware, Appellant Pro Se. Evan Markus Gessner, Lide Pauley, LLC, Lexington, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.


Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Ozie M. Ware seeks to appeal the district court order dismissing his claims against two of the four Defendants named in his law suit. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Ware seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Ware v. Pruitt

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Mar 19, 2010
370 F. App'x 407 (4th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

Ware v. Pruitt

Case Details

Full title:Ozie M. WARE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Rodney PRUITT; Judge Flynn…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Mar 19, 2010

Citations

370 F. App'x 407 (4th Cir. 2010)