From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ware v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Sep 14, 2018
No. 76622 (Nev. App. Sep. 14, 2018)

Opinion

No. 76622

09-14-2018

JIMMIE LEE WARE, Petitioner, v. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK, Respondent, and THE STATE OF NEVADA, Real Party in Interest.


ORDER DENYING PETITION

This is an original petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition. Jimmie Lee Ware argues subsection 7 and subsection 8 of NRS 209.4465 are in conflict and he appears to assert he is entitled to have statutory credit applied to his minimum term. We have considered the petition, and without deciding upon the merits of any claims raised, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter. See NRS 34.160; NRS 34.170; NRS 34.320; NRS 34.330; NRAP 21(b)(1); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) ("Petitioner[] carr[ies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted."). A postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed in the district court in the county in which the petitioner is incarcerated "[i]s the only remedy available to an incarcerated person to challenge the computation of time that the person has served pursuant to a judgment of conviction." NRS 34.724(2)(c); see NRS 34.738(1). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

/s/_________, C.J.

Silver

/s/_________, J.

Tao

/s/_________, J.

Gibbons cc: Jimmie Lee Ware

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Ware v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Sep 14, 2018
No. 76622 (Nev. App. Sep. 14, 2018)
Case details for

Ware v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court

Case Details

Full title:JIMMIE LEE WARE, Petitioner, v. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Sep 14, 2018

Citations

No. 76622 (Nev. App. Sep. 14, 2018)