From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wardlow v. James

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Jun 19, 2012
1:12CV207 (M.D.N.C. Jun. 19, 2012)

Opinion

1:12CV207

06-19-2012

MICHAEL WARDLOW, Plaintiff, v. MAJOR JAMES, et al., Defendant(s).


ORDER

The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and, on May 21, 2012, was served on the parties in this action. No objections were filed within the time limits prescribed by § 636.

The Court hereby adopts the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Doc. 6) is filed and dismissed sua sponte without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a new complaint, on the proper § 1983 forms, after he has exhausted his administrative remedies as to his claims. A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order.

___________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Wardlow v. James

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Jun 19, 2012
1:12CV207 (M.D.N.C. Jun. 19, 2012)
Case details for

Wardlow v. James

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL WARDLOW, Plaintiff, v. MAJOR JAMES, et al., Defendant(s).

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

Date published: Jun 19, 2012

Citations

1:12CV207 (M.D.N.C. Jun. 19, 2012)