From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ward v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four
Nov 15, 1988
759 S.W.2d 607 (Mo. Ct. App. 1988)

Opinion

No. 53966.

August 30, 1988. Application to Transfer Denied November 15, 1988.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS; ANNA C. FORDER, JUDGE.

Dave Hemingway, St. Louis, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Robert V. Franson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.


ORDER


Movant appeals after the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion following an evidentiary hearing. The findings, conclusions, and judgment of the trial court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 27.26(j).

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Ward v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four
Nov 15, 1988
759 S.W.2d 607 (Mo. Ct. App. 1988)
Case details for

Ward v. State

Case Details

Full title:CHESTER WARD, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four

Date published: Nov 15, 1988

Citations

759 S.W.2d 607 (Mo. Ct. App. 1988)