From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ward v. Northern Ohio Telephone Company

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Aug 11, 1967
381 F.2d 16 (6th Cir. 1967)

Opinion

No. 17307.

August 11, 1967.

James B. Davis, Cleveland, Ohio (McDonald, Hopkins Hardy, H. Guy Hardy, Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief), for appellant.

Sidney D. Griffith, Columbus, Ohio (Power, Griffith, Jones Bell, Columbus, Ohio, John R. Eastman, Eastman, Stichter, Smith Bergman, Toledo, Ohio, on the brief), for appellee.

Before PHILLIPS, CELEBREZZE and COMBS, Circuit Judges.


Plaintiff-Appellant, Howard R. Ward, an operator of a radio station, sued, on December 1, 1960, the Northern Ohio Telephone Company for its alleged wrongful failure to furnish him with necessary telephone lines. For the purposes of this appeal, no cause of action as alleged in this suit accrued later than October 1, 1959. 47 U.S.C. § 415 (b) provides as follows:

Ward v. Northern Ohio Telephone Company, 300 F.2d 816 (C.A. 6, 1962).

"All complaints against carriers for the recovery of damages not based on overchargss shall be filed with the Commission within one year from the time the cause of action accrues, and not after, subject to subsection (d) of this section."

In dismissing the Plaintiff's suit, the District Court held that the one year statute of limitations provided for in Section 415(b) applied to civil suits filed in a Federal Court as well as to suits filed before the Commission.

After full consideration of the record, briefs, and arguments of counsel, we conclude that the District Court should be affirmed upon the opinion of District Judge Young reported at 251 F. Supp. 606 (1966).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Ward v. Northern Ohio Telephone Company

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Aug 11, 1967
381 F.2d 16 (6th Cir. 1967)
Case details for

Ward v. Northern Ohio Telephone Company

Case Details

Full title:Howard R. WARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORTHERN OHIO TELEPHONE COMPANY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Aug 11, 1967

Citations

381 F.2d 16 (6th Cir. 1967)

Citing Cases

MFS International, Inc. v. International Telcom Ltd.

Thus, Telcom's argument presents two questions: (1) does the FCA two-year limitations period in § 415(b)…

Drive Train Specialists v. Teleport Communications Group

's Br. at 5). Although the language of Section 415(b) indicates the Section applies to complaints "filed with…