From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ward v. Griffin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jun 29, 2020
19 CIVIL 4759 (VB) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 29, 2020)

Opinion

19 CIVIL 4759 (VB)

06-29-2020

CARLOS WARD, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS GRIFFIN, Assistant Commissioner; ALBERT ACRISH, Nurse Practitioner; FREDERICK N. BERNSTEIN, Medical Director, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated June 29, 2020, defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962); accordingly, this case is closed. Dated: New York, New York

June 29, 2020

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Ward v. Griffin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jun 29, 2020
19 CIVIL 4759 (VB) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 29, 2020)
Case details for

Ward v. Griffin

Case Details

Full title:CARLOS WARD, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS GRIFFIN, Assistant Commissioner; ALBERT…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Jun 29, 2020

Citations

19 CIVIL 4759 (VB) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 29, 2020)