Opinion
1:22-cv-00813-JLT-BAM (PC)
07-18-2023
IBRAHIMA WANE, Plaintiff, v. KORKOR, et al., Defendants.
ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' ANSWER
(ECF No. 26)
BARBARA A. MCAULIFFE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Plaintiff Ibrahima Wane (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff's first amended complaint against Defendants Chen and Kokor for failure to treat Plaintiff's side effects caused by the Celexa medication, in violation of the Eighth Amendment.
Erroneously sued as “Chain” and “Korkor.”
On June 19, 2023, Defendants answered Plaintiff's complaint. (ECF No. 23.) On July 17, 2023, Plaintiff filed a response to Defendants' answer in the form of objections. (ECF No. 26.)
In relevant part, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide that there shall be a complaint, an answer to a complaint, and, if the court orders one, a reply to an answer. Fed.R.Civ.P. 7(a). The Court has not ordered a reply to Defendants' answer and declines to make such an order.
Accordingly, Plaintiff's objections to Defendants' answer, filed on July 17, 2023, (ECF No. 26), are HEREBY STRICKEN from the record.
IT IS SO ORDERED.