From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wander v. Meier

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 26, 2005
17 A.D.3d 264 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

5802.

April 26, 2005.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Sherry Klein Heitler, J.), entered May 5, 2004, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the brief, granted defendants' motion to disqualify plaintiff's counsel, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Wander Associates, P.C., New York (David H. Wander of counsel), for appellant.

Joseph H. Adams, Nyack, for respondents.

Before: Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Marlow, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.


A conflict of interest exists in David Wander's representation of plaintiff, given his prior representation of the interests of defendant Gemini Textiles, Ltd., a company owned by defendant Jeffrey Meier, in two previous transactions. Mr. Wander's former representation of Gemini is substantially related to the current litigation, in which Gemini's financial condition will be placed at issue ( see Kassis v. Teacher's Ins. Annuity Assn., 93 NY2d 611, 617). In addition, Mr. Wander's representation of plaintiff may be reasonably perceived as placing such confidences of defendants as were reposed in Wander during the prior representation in jeopardy of disclosure to an adverse party ( see Code of Professional Responsibility DR 4-101 [ 22 NYCRR 1200.19]). Defendants are "entitled to freedom from apprehension and to certainty that [their] interests will not be [so] prejudiced" ( Cardinale v. Golinello, 43 NY2d 288, 296).


Summaries of

Wander v. Meier

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 26, 2005
17 A.D.3d 264 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

Wander v. Meier

Case Details

Full title:PHILIP WANDER, Appellant, v. JEFFREY MEIER et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 26, 2005

Citations

17 A.D.3d 264 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
793 N.Y.S.2d 406

Citing Cases

Star One S.A. v. Andesat S.A. E.M.A

Before: Concur — Tom, J.P., Saxe, Moskowitz, DeGrasse and Abdus-Salaam, JJ. There is a conflict of interest…