From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wampler-Longacre, Inc. v. Hill

Court of Appeals of Virginia
Dec 12, 1995
Record No. 1805-95-3 (Va. Ct. App. Dec. 12, 1995)

Opinion

Record No. 1805-95-3

Decided: December 12, 1995

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION

Affirmed.

(Cathleen P. Welsh; Wharton, Aldhizer Weaver, on brief), for appellants.

(A. Thomas Lane, Jr., on brief), for appellee.

Present: Chief Judge Moon, Senior Judges Cole and Duff


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pursuant to Code Sec. 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication.


Wampler-Longacre, Inc. and its insurer (hereinafter collectively referred to as "employer") contend that the Workers' Compensation Commission erred in finding that Betty D. Hill's ("claimant") bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome constituted a "disease". Upon reviewing the record and the briefs of the parties, we conclude that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we summarily affirm the commission's decision. Rule 5A:27.

The facts are not in dispute. Claimant's work for employer required repetitive use of her hands. In April 1994, Dr. G. Edward Chappell, Jr., an orthopedic surgeon, diagnosed claimant as suffering from bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome related to her work. The parties stipulated that claimant had no known exposure to the causes of carpal tunnel syndrome outside of her employment.

We recently held in Perdue Farms, Inc. v. McCutchan, 21 Va. App. 65, 69, 461 S.E.2d 431, 433 (1995), that the general medical definition of carpal tunnel syndrome places it within the definition of disease set forth in Piedmont Mfg. Co. v. East, 17 Va. App. 499, 503, 438 S.E.2d 769, 772 (1993). As in Perdue, Hill's condition did not present as an obvious, sudden, mechanical or structural change in her body. Based upon our holding in Perdue and upon Dr. Chappell's diagnosis, we conclude that credible evidence supports the commission's finding that claimant's carpal tunnel syndrome is a condition characterized as a "disease" within the meaning of the Workers' Compensation Act.

Accordingly, we affirm the commission's decision.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Wampler-Longacre, Inc. v. Hill

Court of Appeals of Virginia
Dec 12, 1995
Record No. 1805-95-3 (Va. Ct. App. Dec. 12, 1995)
Case details for

Wampler-Longacre, Inc. v. Hill

Case Details

Full title:WAMPLER-LONGACRE, INC. AND PACIFIC EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. BETTY D…

Court:Court of Appeals of Virginia

Date published: Dec 12, 1995

Citations

Record No. 1805-95-3 (Va. Ct. App. Dec. 12, 1995)