Opinion
Case No. 8:12-CV-1765-T-30EAJ
11-19-2012
ORDER
Before the Court is Petitioner's supplemental memorandum of law, filed on November 15, 2012 (Dkt. 9), in which Petitioner raises additional argument in support of some of the claims raised in his federal habeas petition. Petitioner previously filed a memorandum of law in support of his petition (see Dkt. 2). Subsequently, on October 10, 2012, the Court ordered Respondent to show cause why the petition should not be granted (see Dkt. 8).
Local Rule 3.01 states in pertinent part:
(a) In a motion or other application for an order, the movant shall include a concise statement of the precise relief requested, a statement of the basis for the request, and a memorandum of legal authority in support of the request, all of which the movant shall include in a single document not more than twenty-five (25) pages.(emphasis added).
(b) Each party opposing a motion or application shall file within fourteen (14) days after service of the motion or application a response that includes a memorandum of legal authority in opposition to the request, all of which the respondent shall include in a document not more than twenty (20) pages.
(c) No party shall file any reply or further memorandum directed to the motion or response allowed in (a) and (b) unless the Court grants leave.
Petitioner did not request leave of court prior to filing the supplemental memorandum. Moreover, piecemeal litigation is disfavored. Petitioner, therefore, will be granted leave to file an amended memorandum of law. Petitioner is advised that the amended memorandum will completely supersede the original memorandum (Dkt. 2), and the Court will not consider the original memorandum if Petitioner files an amended memorandum.
Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that:
1. Petitioner's supplemental memorandum of law (Dkt. 9) is STRICKEN. The Clerk shall return the supplemental memorandum of law to Petitioner with his copy of this Order.
2. Petitioner may, on or before December 19, 2012, file an amended memorandum of law that does not exceed thirty (30) pages.
3. On or before January 18, 2013, Respondent shall file a response to the federal habeas petition, and show cause why the petition should not be granted. At that time, Respondent shall also file with the Court the appendix of exhibits in support of the response.
4. On or before February 17, 2013, Petitioner may file a reply that does not exceed twenty (20) pages.
5. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send a copy of this Order to Respondent, including the Attorney General of the State of Florida. A copy of this Order shall also be served on the Petitioner.
DONE and ORDERED in Tampa, Florida on November 19, 2012.
______________
JAMES S. MOODY , JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
SA:sfc
Copy furnished to:
Pro Se Petitioner
Respondent
Attorney General, State of Florida