From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walther v. Maple

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Mar 2, 2016
Appellate Case No. 2013-002569 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 2, 2016)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2013-002569 Unpublished Opinion No. 2016-UP-095

03-02-2016

Steffani Walther and Michael Walther, Appellants, v. Eddie Maple and Kate Maple, individually and d/b/a Equine Management, LLC, Respondents.

Robert V. Mathison, Jr., of Mathison & Mathison, of Hilton Head Island, for Appellants. David Starr Cobb, of Turner Padget Graham & Laney, PA, of Charleston, for Respondents.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. Appeal From Beaufort County
Maite D. Murphy, Circuit Court Judge

AFFIRMED

Robert V. Mathison, Jr., of Mathison & Mathison, of Hilton Head Island, for Appellants. David Starr Cobb, of Turner Padget Graham & Laney, PA, of Charleston, for Respondents. PER CURIAM : Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: Wilder Corp. v. Wilke, 330 S.C. 71, 76, 497 S.E.2d 731, 733 (1998) ("It is axiomatic that an issue cannot be raised for the first time on appeal, but must have been raised to and ruled upon by the trial [court] to be preserved for appellate review."); id. at 77, 497 S.E.2d at 734 ("Post-trial motions . . . are used to preserve those [issues] that have been raised to the trial court but not yet ruled upon by it." (emphasis added)). AFFIRMED. SHORT, GEATHERS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR. --------


Summaries of

Walther v. Maple

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Mar 2, 2016
Appellate Case No. 2013-002569 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 2, 2016)
Case details for

Walther v. Maple

Case Details

Full title:Steffani Walther and Michael Walther, Appellants, v. Eddie Maple and Kate…

Court:STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Mar 2, 2016

Citations

Appellate Case No. 2013-002569 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 2, 2016)