From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walter Branch v. Annucci

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 16, 2021
20 Civ. 7968 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 16, 2021)

Opinion

20 Civ. 7968 (ER)

12-16-2021

WALTER BRANCH, Plaintiff, v. ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, NA-KIN WALTON, MR. GIBSON, and LEWIS, Defendants.


ORDER

Ramos, D.J.

Defendants filed a motion to dismiss in this action on April 8, 2021. Doc. 27. foe Honorable Judge Nathan ordered Plaintiff Branch to respond to the motion within four weeks of the date of service of Defendants' motion. Doc. 31. Defendants mailed a copy of the motion to Branch on April 8, 2021. As of this date, Branch has not responded to the motion. foe case was reassigned to Judge Ramos on December 10, 2021, and Branch's address has changed. Branch is now directed to respond to the motion, Doc. 31, by January 20, 2022. Failure to do so will result in the Court deeming the motion unopposed. Branch is also reminded that it is his responsibility to submit a written notification to the Court if his address changes, and the Court may dismiss the action upon failure to do so.

The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to (i) change Plaintiff's mailing address on the docket to: Five Points Correctional Facility, 6600 State Route 96, Caller Box 119, Romulus, NY 14541; and (ii) mail a copy of this Order and the motion dated April 8, 2021 (Doc. 27) to Plaintiff's changed address. 1

It is SO ORDERED. 2


Summaries of

Walter Branch v. Annucci

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 16, 2021
20 Civ. 7968 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 16, 2021)
Case details for

Walter Branch v. Annucci

Case Details

Full title:WALTER BRANCH, Plaintiff, v. ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, NA-KIN WALTON, MR…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 16, 2021

Citations

20 Civ. 7968 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 16, 2021)