From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wallway v. Schneider

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION
Jan 3, 2019
CV 17-71-M-DLC-JCL (D. Mont. Jan. 3, 2019)

Opinion

CV 17-71-M-DLC-JCL

01-03-2019

RANDY RAYMOND WALLWAY, Plaintiff, v. MHP OFFICER SCHNEIDER, Defendants.


ORDER

United States Magistrate Judge Jeremiah C. Lynch entered his Findings and Recommendations in this case on November 1, 2018, recommending Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment be granted and this action be dismissed. (Doc. 26 at 8.) Plaintiff did not object to the Findings and Recommendations and so has waived the right to de novo review thereof. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Absent objection, this Court reviews findings and recommendations for clear error. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Clear error exists if the Court is left with a "definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed." United States v. Syrax, 235 F.3d 422, 427 (9th Cir. 2000) (citations omitted). Reviewing for clear error and finding none,

IT IS ORDERED that Judge Lynch's Findings and Recommendations (Doc. 26) are ADOPTED IN FULL. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 23) is GRANTED and this action is DISMISSED.

DATED this 3rd day of January, 2019.

/s/_________

Dana L. Christensen, Chief Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Wallway v. Schneider

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION
Jan 3, 2019
CV 17-71-M-DLC-JCL (D. Mont. Jan. 3, 2019)
Case details for

Wallway v. Schneider

Case Details

Full title:RANDY RAYMOND WALLWAY, Plaintiff, v. MHP OFFICER SCHNEIDER, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION

Date published: Jan 3, 2019

Citations

CV 17-71-M-DLC-JCL (D. Mont. Jan. 3, 2019)

Citing Cases

Weeks v. Hurst

This Court's general practice is to review unobjected to portions of a magistrate's proposed findings and…

O'Neil v. Steele

This Court's general practice is to review unobjected to portions of a magistrate's proposed findings and…