From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wallace v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
Jul 14, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:16cv930 (E.D. Tex. Jul. 14, 2018)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:16cv930

07-14-2018

TIFFANY J. WALLACE, #56099-180 v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA


MEMORANDUM OPINION ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND ENTERING FINAL JUDGMENT

Movant Tiffany Joanne Wallace, a federal prisoner confined at the Carswell Federal Medical Center in Ft. Worth, Texas, filed this motion to vacate, set aside, or correct her federal sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The motion was referred for findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations for disposition of the case.

After a review of the pleadings, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report, (Dkt. #11), recommending that Wallace's motion be dismissed with prejudice. A copy of this Report was sent to Wallace at her address; return receipt requested. However, to date, no objections to the Report have been filed. Wallace has neither filed a notice of a change of address nor communicated with the Court since February 2018.

Accordingly, Wallace is barred from de novo review by the District Judge of those findings, conclusions, and recommendations and, except upon grounds of plain error, from appellate review of the unobjected-to proposed factual findings and legal conclusions accepted and adopted by the district court. Douglass v. United Services Automobile Association, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc).

The Court has reviewed the pleadings in this cause and the Report of the Magistrate Judge. Upon such review, the Court has determined that the Report of the Magistrate Judge is correct. See United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 918, 109 S.Ct. 3243 (1989) (where no objections to a Magistrate Judge's Report are filed, the standard of review is "clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law."). Accordingly it is

ORDERED that the Report of the Magistrate Judge, (Dkt. #11), is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Further, it is

ORDERED that Movant's section 2255 motion is DISMISSED with prejudice. Finally, it is

ORDERED that any and all motions which may be pending in this civil action are hereby DENIED.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 14 day of July, 2018.

/s/_________

Ron Clark, United States District Judge


Summaries of

Wallace v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
Jul 14, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:16cv930 (E.D. Tex. Jul. 14, 2018)
Case details for

Wallace v. United States

Case Details

Full title:TIFFANY J. WALLACE, #56099-180 v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Date published: Jul 14, 2018

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:16cv930 (E.D. Tex. Jul. 14, 2018)