From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wallace v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Nov 11, 1997
955 S.W.2d 794 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997)

Opinion

No. 71726

Date: November 11, 1997

Appeal From: Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. Thomas J. Frawley

Deborah B. Wafer, Counsel for Appellant. John Munson Morris Breck K. Burgess, Counsel for Respondent.

Grimm, P.J., Pudlowski and Gaertner, JJ., concur.


ORDER


Appellant, Otis Wallace, appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Wallace v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Nov 11, 1997
955 S.W.2d 794 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997)
Case details for

Wallace v. State

Case Details

Full title:OTIS WALLACE, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Nov 11, 1997

Citations

955 S.W.2d 794 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997)