From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wallace v. New York

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jan 8, 2013
12-CV-5866(S JF)(WDW) (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 8, 2013)

Opinion

12-CV-5866(S JF)(WDW)

01-08-2013

TROY C. WALLACE, RICHARD T. GEOFFRION, MARCELLO M. AIELLO, JOSHUA L. FACTOR, CHARLES MCLAUREN, JEHOVAH COLON, ROBERT BLUNT, ANGEL TIRADO, EARL CALLOWAY, Plaintiffs, v. STATE OF NEW YORK, COMMISSIONER OF NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, HOUSING COORDINATOR FOR SUFFOLK COUNTY RIVERHEAD TRAILERS SUSAN WESTERGARD, TOWN OF SOUTH HAMPTON MAYOR MARK EPLEY, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, NEW YORK, COMMUNITY HOUSING INNOVATIONS, INC. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR ALEXANDER M. ROBERTS, Defendants.


ORDER

FEUERSTEIN, J.

On November 26, 2012, pro se plaintiff Troy C. Wallace ("Wallace") filed an in forma pauperis complaint against the State of New York, Susan Westergard, Suffolk County Department of Social Services, the Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, the County of Suffolk, Mayor Mark Epley, the Town of South Hampton Police Department and Alexander M. Roberts, Community Housing Innovations. The complaint alleges, inter alia, that the defendants' efforts to enforce New York Corrections Law §168 ("Megan's Law") against Wallace is unconstitutional in that it violates the "ex post facto clause." On November 28, 2012, Wallace filed an amended complaint that now includes eight additional plaintiffs: Richard T. Geoffrion, Marcello M. Aiello, Joshua L. Factor, Charles McLauren, Jehovah Colon, Robert Blunty, Angel Tirado, and Earl Calloway. Like the original complaint, the gist of plaintiffs' claims is that the retroactive application of Megan's Law to them is unconstitutional. The amended complaint also now names as defendants the State of New York, the Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, the Housing Coordinator for Suffolk County Riverhead Trailers Susan Westergard, Town of South Hampton Mayor Mark Epley, the County of Suffolk, and Community Housing Innovations, Inc. Executive Director Alexander M. Roberts.

Upon review of Wallace's declaration in support of his application to proceed in forma pauperis, plaintiff's financial status qualifies him to commence this action without prepayment of the filing fees. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). Accordingly, plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to forward copies of the summonses, complaint and amended complaint and this Order to the United States Marshals Service for service upon the defendants without prepayment of fees, and to mail a copy of this Order to the pro se plaintiffs.

SO ORDERED.

______________________

Sandra J. Feuerstein

United States District Judge
Dated: January 8, 2013

Central Islip, New York


Summaries of

Wallace v. New York

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jan 8, 2013
12-CV-5866(S JF)(WDW) (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 8, 2013)
Case details for

Wallace v. New York

Case Details

Full title:TROY C. WALLACE, RICHARD T. GEOFFRION, MARCELLO M. AIELLO, JOSHUA L…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Jan 8, 2013

Citations

12-CV-5866(S JF)(WDW) (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 8, 2013)

Citing Cases

People v. Kramer

Moore remains sub judice. In another case pending in the Eastern District, Wallace v. New York, 2013 U.S.…

People v. Kramer

In another case pending in the Eastern District, Wallace v. New York, 2013 U.S. Dist. Lexis 51771 (E.D.NY…