From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wallace v. Miller

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Jun 26, 2012
Case No. 09-cv-342-JPG (S.D. Ill. Jun. 26, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 09-cv-342-JPG

06-26-2012

MAURICE WALLACE, Plaintiff, v. CARL MILLER, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on the Stipulation of Dismissal (Doc. 138) of plaintiff Maurice Wallace's claims against defendant Benyomin Scheiman pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) signed by all parties. Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) allows dismissal by a plaintiff without a court order by filing such a stipulation. Therefore, the Court finds that Wallace's claims against Scheiman are DISMISSED with prejudice and DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to enter judgment accordingly at the close of the case. Scheiman is terminated as a party to this case. The plaintiff's dismissal of Scheiman renders MOOT Scheiman's motion to dismiss (Doc. 115) and Magistrate Judge Frazier's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 129) recommending the Court grant in part and deny in part that motion.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________

J. PHIL GILBERT

DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Wallace v. Miller

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Jun 26, 2012
Case No. 09-cv-342-JPG (S.D. Ill. Jun. 26, 2012)
Case details for

Wallace v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:MAURICE WALLACE, Plaintiff, v. CARL MILLER, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Date published: Jun 26, 2012

Citations

Case No. 09-cv-342-JPG (S.D. Ill. Jun. 26, 2012)