From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wallace v. Jacobson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Nov 4, 2020
18 CIVIL 2905 (VB) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 4, 2020)

Opinion

18 CIVIL 2905 (VB)

11-04-2020

MARK WALLACE, Petitioner, v. CATHERINE JACOBSON, Respondent.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order dated November 4, 2020, the R&R is adopted as the opinion of the Court, and the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. As petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Love v. McCray, 413 F.3d 192, 195 (2d Cir. 2005). The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962); accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York

November 4, 2020

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Wallace v. Jacobson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Nov 4, 2020
18 CIVIL 2905 (VB) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 4, 2020)
Case details for

Wallace v. Jacobson

Case Details

Full title:MARK WALLACE, Petitioner, v. CATHERINE JACOBSON, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Nov 4, 2020

Citations

18 CIVIL 2905 (VB) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 4, 2020)