Opinion
No. 75987
06-05-2018
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION
This emergency petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition challenges a district court order granting a stay upon posting a bond and meeting various other conditions.
Writs of mandamus and prohibition are proper only when there is no plain, adequate and speedy legal remedy. NRS 34.170; NRS 34.330. As petitioner may seek this court's review of the district court's conditions for stay and a stay from this court in the context of her appeal, see Clark Cty. Office of Coroner/Med. Exam'r v. Las Vegas Review-Journal, 134 Nev., Adv. Op. 24, 415 P.3d 16, 17 n.2 (2018) (citing Nelson v. Heer, 121 Nev. 832, 834, 122 P.3d 1252, 1253 (2005)), which she has done, see The Bank Of New York Mellon v. NV Eagles, LLC, Docket No. 73802 (May 29, 2018, Emergency Motion for Stay), we conclude that an adequate remedy exists, precluding writ relief. Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED.
/s/_________, C.J.
Silver
/s/_________, J.
Tao cc: Hon. Joseph Hardy, Jr., District Judge
Allison R. Schmidt, Esq, LLC
Joseph Y. Hong
Eighth District Court Clerk