From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wallace v. Cougar Columbia Hudson LLC

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Columbia Division
Jan 23, 2024
Civil Action 3:23-5903-MGL-SVH (D.S.C. Jan. 23, 2024)

Opinion

Civil Action 3:23-5903-MGL-SVH

01-23-2024

JOSHUA ANDREW WALLACE, Plaintiff, v. COUGAR COLUMBIA HUDSON, LLC, ED YEAGER, MALENA BECKMAN, and RICKY RAGANS, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS

MARY GEIGER LEWIS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff Joshua Andrew Wallace (Wallace) filed this lawsuit against Ed Yeager, Malena Beckman, and Ricky Ragans (Individual Defendants) and Cougar Columbia Hudson, LLC. Wallace is self represented.

The matter is before the Court for review of the Report and Recommendation (Report) of the United States Magistrate Judge suggesting Individual Defendants be dismissed. The Report was made in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Local Civil Rule 73.02 for the District of South Carolina.

The Magistrate Judge makes only a recommendation to this Court. The recommendation has no presumptive weight. The responsibility to make a final determination remains with the Court. Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 270 (1976). The Court is charged with making a de novo determination of those portions of the Report to which specific objection is made, and the Court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge or recommit the matter with instructions. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

The Magistrate Judge filed the Report on January 4, 2024, but Wallace failed to file any objections. “[I]n the absence of a timely filed objection, a district court need not conduct a de novo review, but instead must ‘only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.'” Diamond v. Colonial Life & Acc. Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005) (quoting Fed.R.Civ.P. 72 advisory committee's note). Moreover, a failure to object waives appellate review. Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985).

After a thorough review of the Report and the record in this case pursuant to the standard set forth above, the Court adopts the Report and incorporates it herein. Therefore, it is the judgment of the Court Individual Defendants are DISMISSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL

The parties are hereby notified of the right to appeal this Order within thirty days from the date hereof, pursuant to Rules 3 and 4 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.


Summaries of

Wallace v. Cougar Columbia Hudson LLC

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Columbia Division
Jan 23, 2024
Civil Action 3:23-5903-MGL-SVH (D.S.C. Jan. 23, 2024)
Case details for

Wallace v. Cougar Columbia Hudson LLC

Case Details

Full title:JOSHUA ANDREW WALLACE, Plaintiff, v. COUGAR COLUMBIA HUDSON, LLC, ED…

Court:United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Columbia Division

Date published: Jan 23, 2024

Citations

Civil Action 3:23-5903-MGL-SVH (D.S.C. Jan. 23, 2024)