From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wallace v. Banks

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI JACKSON DIVISION
Aug 13, 2018
CAUSE NO. 3:16-cv-00669-CWR-RHW (S.D. Miss. Aug. 13, 2018)

Opinion

CAUSE NO. 3:16-cv-00669-CWR-RHW

08-13-2018

ERIC WALLACE PLAINTIFF v. BANKS, ET AL. DEFENDANTS


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Robert H. Walker. Docket No. 28. After examining the record evidence in this case, he recommended that Eric Wallace's 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus be denied. Id. Wallace has objected to the Report and Recommendation. Docket No. 31.

Having fully reviewed the Report and Recommendation, as well as the arguments contained in Wallace's objection, the Court concludes that the Report and Recommendation is well-reasoned and legally correct, and therefore overrules the Plaintiff's objection. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted fully as this Court's own Order. Accordingly, it is ordered that Plaintiff's writ of habeas corpus be denied and dismissed with prejudice. A separate Final Judgment shall issue this day. No Certificate of Appealability shall issue.

SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, this the 13th day of August, 2018.

s/ Carlton W. Reeves

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Wallace v. Banks

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI JACKSON DIVISION
Aug 13, 2018
CAUSE NO. 3:16-cv-00669-CWR-RHW (S.D. Miss. Aug. 13, 2018)
Case details for

Wallace v. Banks

Case Details

Full title:ERIC WALLACE PLAINTIFF v. BANKS, ET AL. DEFENDANTS

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI JACKSON DIVISION

Date published: Aug 13, 2018

Citations

CAUSE NO. 3:16-cv-00669-CWR-RHW (S.D. Miss. Aug. 13, 2018)

Citing Cases

Moore v. Portillo

In a non-capital case, failure to give a lesser-included-offense or circumstantial-evidence instruction does…