From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wallace v. Annucci

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Jan 26, 2017
146 A.D.3d 1263 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

01-26-2017

In the Matter of Lusher WALLACE, Petitioner, v. Anthony J. ANNUCCI, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

Lusher Wallace, Coxsackie, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.


Lusher Wallace, Coxsackie, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge a tier III prison disciplinary determination. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. In light of this, and given that petitioner has been afforded all of the relief to which he is entitled, the petition is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Kirshtein v. New York State Dept. of Corr. & Community Supervision, 142 A.D.3d 1246, 1246, 37 N.Y.S.3d 718 [2016] ; Matter of Boyd v. Annucci, 142 A.D.3d 1214, 1214, 37 N.Y.S.3d 458 [2016] ). Although petitioner has also requested to be restored to the status that he enjoyed prior to the disciplinary determination, he is not entitled to such relief (see Matter of Ramirez v. Annucci, 142 A.D.3d 1198, 1198, 37 N.Y.S.3d 465 [2016] ; Matter of Guiffre v. Annucci, 142 A.D.3d 1193, 1193, 37 N.Y.S.3d 463 [2016] ). He is, however, entitled to the restoration of any good time lost as a result of the determination (see Matter of Ramirez v. Annucci, 142 A.D.3d at 1198, 37 N.Y.S.3d 465; Matter of Guiffre v. Annucci, 142 A.D.3d at 1193, 37 N.Y.S.3d 463).ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

PETERS, P.J., GARRY, LYNCH, DEVINE and AARONS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wallace v. Annucci

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Jan 26, 2017
146 A.D.3d 1263 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

Wallace v. Annucci

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Lusher WALLACE, Petitioner, v. Anthony J. ANNUCCI, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 26, 2017

Citations

146 A.D.3d 1263 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
44 N.Y.S.3d 923
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 526

Citing Cases

Weston v. Annucci

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all…