From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wallace Tiernan Co. v. U.S. Cutlery Co.

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 19, 1925
98 N.J. Eq. 699 (N.J. 1925)

Opinion

Argued May term, 1925.

Decided October 19th, 1925.

Messrs. Edward M. Runyon Colie, for the appellant.

Mr. Benjamin F. Jones, for the respondent.

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Backes, whose opinion is reported in 97 N.J. Eq. 408.


The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes.

For affirmance — PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, WHITE, McGLENNON, KAYS, JJ. 9.

For reversal — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, LLOYD, VAN BUSKIRK. JJ. 3.


Summaries of

Wallace Tiernan Co. v. U.S. Cutlery Co.

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 19, 1925
98 N.J. Eq. 699 (N.J. 1925)
Case details for

Wallace Tiernan Co. v. U.S. Cutlery Co.

Case Details

Full title:WALLACE TIERNAN COMPANY, INCORPORATED, respondent, v. UNITED STATES…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Oct 19, 1925

Citations

98 N.J. Eq. 699 (N.J. 1925)

Citing Cases

Melucci v. Eagan

Now the rule is well established that filling the air around a dwelling with noxious or offensive vapors or…

Kosich v. Poultrymen's Service Corp.

"The right of enjoyment [of private property] is surrendered in a factory district, only, to the extent of…