From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walker v. Weinstock

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 23, 1998
255 A.D.2d 508 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

November 23, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Douglass, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The trial evidence amply supports the Supreme Court's determination, inter alia, that the appellants Israel Weinstock and JB Trading International, Ltd., had no interest in 4200 Avenue K Realty Corporation or the property owned by that corporation. The terms of, and the circumstances surrounding, the assignments through which the appellants claim ownership rendered those assignments void as the products of coercion and overreaching ( see, Weinstock v. Weinstock, 167 A.D.2d 394).

The appellants' remaining contentions are without merit.

Bracken, J. P., Ritter, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur. [See, 173 Misc.2d 1.]


Summaries of

Walker v. Weinstock

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 23, 1998
255 A.D.2d 508 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Walker v. Weinstock

Case Details

Full title:JACK WALKER, et al., Respondents, v. ISRAEL WEINSTOCK et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 23, 1998

Citations

255 A.D.2d 508 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
680 N.Y.S.2d 177

Citing Cases

Tornheim v. Tornheim

The plaintiff failed to present any evidence of fraud on the part of the defendant ( see CPLR 5015[a][3]).…

In re Handler

trial evidence amply supports the Supreme Court's determination that the appellants Israel Weinstock and JB…