(ECF No. 1 at PAGEID # 3.) Cf. Walker v. Wechsler, No. 1:16-cv-01417-JLT (PC), 2017 WL 2535340, at *3 (E.D. Cal. June 12, 2017) (revoking in forma pauperis status once the court learned that the plaintiff had omitted from his application that he had $10,000, at the time he filed his application and "it is clear that Plaintiff was not impoverished when he filed this action"); Pierre v. Miami Dade Cty. Public Sch., No. 14-22045-CIV, 2014 WL 5393045, at *1 (S.D. Fla. Oct. 22, 2014) (denying request to proceed in forma pauperis where the plaintiff's monthly income was $1,828, she had a checking account with a balance of $15,000, and her monthly expenses totaled approximately $2,000). In addition, Plaintiff's affidavit reflects that his average monthly income is $6,160 (ECF No. 1 at PAGEID # 2.), which places Plaintiff's income at more than six times the poverty level of income for a family of one.
(ECF No. 1 at PAGEID # 3.) Cf. Walker v. Wechsler, No. 1:16-cv-01417-JLT (PC), 2017 WL 2535340, at *3 (E.D. Cal. June 12, 2017) (revoking in forma pauperis status once the court learned that the plaintiff had omitted from his application that he had $10,000, at the time he filed his application and "it is clear that Plaintiff was not impoverished when he filed this action"); Pierre v. Miami Dade Cty. Public Sch., No. 14-22045-CIV, 2014 WL 5393045, at *1 (S.D. Fla. Oct. 22, 2014) (denying request to proceed in forma pauperis where the plaintiff's monthly income was $1,828, she had a checking account with a balance of $15,000, and her monthly expenses totaled approximately $2,000). In addition, Plaintiff's affidavit reflects that his average monthly income is $6,160 (ECF No. 1 at PAGEID # 2.), which places Plaintiff's income at more than six times the poverty level of income for a family of one.