From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walker v. Walt Disney

United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio
Sep 26, 2024
1:23-cv-574 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 26, 2024)

Opinion

1:23-cv-574

09-26-2024

TRAVIS WALKER, Plaintiff, v. WALT DISNEY, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

JEFFERY P. HOPKINS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This matter is before the Court the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 12) issued by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on March 26, 2024. The Magistrate Judge recommends that Defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2) (Doc. 5) be granted. No objections have been filed and the time for filing such objections under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) has expired.

Having carefully reviewed the comprehensive findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge and finding no clear error, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 72 (advisory committee notes) (“When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the fact of the record in order to accept the recommendation”); see e.g., Roane v. Warden of Corr. Reception Ctr., No. 2:22-cv-2768, 2022 WL 16535903, at *1 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 28, 2022). Accordingly, Defendant's motion to dismiss (Doc. 5) is GRANTED. This case is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of personal jurisdiction.

The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Walker v. Walt Disney

United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio
Sep 26, 2024
1:23-cv-574 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 26, 2024)
Case details for

Walker v. Walt Disney

Case Details

Full title:TRAVIS WALKER, Plaintiff, v. WALT DISNEY, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio

Date published: Sep 26, 2024

Citations

1:23-cv-574 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 26, 2024)