From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walker v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Apr 20, 2018
Civ. No. 1:16-cv-01880-CL (D. Or. Apr. 20, 2018)

Opinion

Civ. No. 1:16-cv-01880-CL

04-20-2018

ANGIE WALKER, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant.


ORDER :

Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 43), and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. Plaintiff filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, I have reviewed the file of this case de novo. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). I find no error and conclude the report is correct. Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 43) is adopted. Because Plaintiff's Amended Complaint lacks an arguable basis in law or fact, her appeal of its dismissal is frivolous. Franklin v. Murphy, 745 F.2d 1221, 1225 (9th Cir. 1984). Plaintiff's IFP status is revoked. IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 20th day of April, 2018.

/s/ Michael J. McShane

Michael McShane

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Walker v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Apr 20, 2018
Civ. No. 1:16-cv-01880-CL (D. Or. Apr. 20, 2018)
Case details for

Walker v. United States

Case Details

Full title:ANGIE WALKER, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Apr 20, 2018

Citations

Civ. No. 1:16-cv-01880-CL (D. Or. Apr. 20, 2018)