From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walker v. Tinalux Assocs.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Oct 11, 2022
2:20-cv-11030-JLS-RAO (C.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2022)

Opinion

2:20-cv-11030-JLS-RAO

10-11-2022

PHILLIP WALKER, an individual, Plaintiff, v. TINALUX ASSOCIATES, LP, a California limited partnership; SUBWAY #7953, a business of unknown form; and Does 1-10, Defendants.


ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE

JOSEPHINE L STATON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41, the Court, having considered the Joint Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice of All Defendants (Doc. 52) before it, ORDERS as follows:

Plaintiff Phillip Walker's action against Defendants Tinalux Associates, LP & Lacren, LLC (erroneously named as Subway No. 7953) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Each party will be responsible for its own fees and costs.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Walker v. Tinalux Assocs.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Oct 11, 2022
2:20-cv-11030-JLS-RAO (C.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2022)
Case details for

Walker v. Tinalux Assocs.

Case Details

Full title:PHILLIP WALKER, an individual, Plaintiff, v. TINALUX ASSOCIATES, LP, a…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Oct 11, 2022

Citations

2:20-cv-11030-JLS-RAO (C.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2022)