From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walker v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jun 17, 1997
704 So. 2d 566 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Opinion

Case No. 96-4458

Opinion filed June 17, 1997.

An appeal from the Circuit Court of Bay County. Dedee Costello, Judge.

Appellant Pro Se.

No Appearance for Appellee.


Randy Walker, the defendant, appeals the trial court's order summarily denying his postconviction motion under rule 3.850 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The order recites that the defendant's claims are conclusively refuted by attached portions of the record, but the portions of the record to which the court referred were not attached. Because the defendant has asserted several facially sufficient claims, the trial court erred in summarily denying the motion. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850(d). We reverse and remand this cause to the trial court for attachment of those portions of the record that conclusively refute appellant's claims or an evidentiary hearing. Hall v. State, 603 So.2d 650 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Wells v. State, 598 So.2d 259 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Oehling v. State, 659 So.2d 1226 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995).

Reversed and remanded.

WEBSTER, MICKLE and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR.


Summaries of

Walker v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jun 17, 1997
704 So. 2d 566 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
Case details for

Walker v. State

Case Details

Full title:RANDY ROOSEVELT WALKER, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Jun 17, 1997

Citations

704 So. 2d 566 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)