From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walker v. Reffitt

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Sep 30, 2021
3:18-cv-00779 (M.D. Tenn. Sep. 30, 2021)

Opinion

3:18-cv-00779

09-30-2021

STEPHEN WALKER, Plaintiff, v. BRANDON REFFITT, et al., Defendants.


FRENSLEY MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ORDER

WILLIAM L. CAMPBELL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pending before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 26), which was filed on September 21, 2021. Through the Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends that this action be dismissed without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) for failure to effect service of process on Defendants Walker and Haggard. Plaintiff has been on notice since March 4, 2020, that service has not been effectuated on these Defendants. (See Doc. Nos. 22, 23). As of the entry of this Order, Plaintiff has not served the remaining defendants or filed objections to the Report and Recommendation.

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and concludes it should be adopted and approved. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to close the file.

It is so ORDERED. 1


Summaries of

Walker v. Reffitt

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Sep 30, 2021
3:18-cv-00779 (M.D. Tenn. Sep. 30, 2021)
Case details for

Walker v. Reffitt

Case Details

Full title:STEPHEN WALKER, Plaintiff, v. BRANDON REFFITT, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division

Date published: Sep 30, 2021

Citations

3:18-cv-00779 (M.D. Tenn. Sep. 30, 2021)