From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walker v. NYS Div. of Human Rights

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Jun 17, 2015
129 A.D.3d 980 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

2013-09353

06-17-2015

In the Matter of Arthur E. Walker, appellant, v. NYS Division of Human Rights, et al., respondents.

Arthur E. Walker, Albany, N.Y., appellant pro se. Robert F. Meehan, County Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (James Castro-Blanco and Sean Carey of counsel), for respondent Westchester Community College.


L. PRISCILLA HALL

LEONARD B. AUSTIN

HECTOR D. LASALLE, JJ. (Index No. 5172/12)

Arthur E. Walker, Albany, N.Y., appellant pro se.

Robert F. Meehan, County Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (James Castro-Blanco and Sean Carey of counsel), for respondent Westchester Community College.

DECISION & ORDER

In a proceeding pursuant to Executive Law § 298 and CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the New York State Division of Human Rights dated October 16, 2012, dismissing the petitioner's administrative complaint upon a finding that there was no probable cause to believe that Westchester Community College engaged in an unlawful discriminatory practice in terminating his employment, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Zambelli, J.), entered July 29, 2013, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Where, as here, the New York State Division of Human Rights (hereinafter the NYSDHR) renders a determination of no probable cause without holding a hearing, "the appropriate standard of review is whether the probable cause determination was arbitrary and capricious or lacked a rational basis" (Matter of Gordon v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 126 AD3d 697, 698; see Matter of Ramirez v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 4 NY3d 789, 790). Here, the NYSDHR's determination that there was no probable cause was not arbitrary and capricious or lacking a rational basis in the record.

The parties' remaining contentions are either without merit or not properly before this Court.

Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

RIVERA, J.P., HALL, AUSTIN and LASALLE, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court


Summaries of

Walker v. NYS Div. of Human Rights

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Jun 17, 2015
129 A.D.3d 980 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

Walker v. NYS Div. of Human Rights

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Arthur E. Walker, appellant, v. NYS Division of Human…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: Jun 17, 2015

Citations

129 A.D.3d 980 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 5199
10 N.Y.S.3d 453

Citing Cases

Steinberg-Fisher v. N. Shore Towers Apartments, Inc.

To establish that a violation of the Human Rights Law (Executive Law article 15) occurred and a reasonable…

Prevost v. N.Y. State Div. of Human Rights

Here, the DHR's determination that there was no probable cause was not arbitrary and capricious or lacking a…