From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

WALKER v. MOAK

United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Oct 22, 2008
CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-7738, SECTION "C"(4) (E.D. La. Oct. 22, 2008)

Summary

dismissing without prejudice a § 1983 action for failure to prosecute under Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure where the plaintiff did not notify the court of his new address upon his release from jail

Summary of this case from Morrison v. Miller

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-7738, SECTION "C"(4).

October 22, 2008


ORDER


The Court, having considered the complaint, the record, the applicable law, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and the failure of any party to file an objection to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, hereby approves the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and adopts it as its opinion in this matter. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) for Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies (Rec. Doc. No. 13) filed by the defendants, Sergeant David Moak, Captain Jeff Williams, and Lieutenant Wade Rigdon, is DISMISSED as moot.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Darrell Mack Walker's Title 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the defendants, Sergeant David Moak, Sergeant Laramie King, Lieutenant Wade Rigdon, and Captain JeffWilliams, is DISMISSED WITHPREJUDICE for failure to prosecute under Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).


Summaries of

WALKER v. MOAK

United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Oct 22, 2008
CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-7738, SECTION "C"(4) (E.D. La. Oct. 22, 2008)

dismissing without prejudice a § 1983 action for failure to prosecute under Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure where the plaintiff did not notify the court of his new address upon his release from jail

Summary of this case from Morrison v. Miller
Case details for

WALKER v. MOAK

Case Details

Full title:DARRELL MACK WALKER v. SERGEANT DAVID MOAK, SERGEANT LARAMIE KING…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Date published: Oct 22, 2008

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-7738, SECTION "C"(4) (E.D. La. Oct. 22, 2008)

Citing Cases

Shine v. Mecklenburg Cnty. Jail

See Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1441 (9th Cir. 1988) (“A party, not the district court, bears the burden of…

Morrison v. Miller

Where a pro se plaintiff has failed to notify the Court of his change of address, the action is subject to…