Opinion
18 CIVIL 4090 (VEC)
12-03-2020
KEVIN WALKER, Plaintiff, v. JOON KIM, Acting U.S. Attorney; KARIN PORTLOCK, AUSA; JONATHAN REBOLD, AUSA; ANDREW ADAMS, AUSA; JORDAN L. ESTES, AUSA; AMANDA KRAMER AUSA; DINA McLEOD, AUSA; FRANK J. BALSAMELLO, AUSA; JESSICA LONERGAN, AUSA; JARED LENOW, AUSA; HADASSA WAXMAN, AUSA; DANIEL CHURLA, NYPD; MICHAEL McCREADY, STEVEN ST. HILAIRE; JOANNE BECK, ATF; KEITH SMITH ATF; JASON ALLISON, ATF, Defendants.
JUDGMENT
It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated December 3, 2020, this Court ADOPTS the R&R in full. Defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Because the R&R gave the parties adequate warning, see R&R at 38, Plaintiff's failure to file adequate and specific objections to the R&R precludes appellate review of this decision. See Caidor v. Onondaga Cty., 517 F.3d 601, 604 (2d Cir. 2008); Mario v. P & C Food Mkts., Inc., 313 F.3d 758, 766 (2d Cir. 2002). Accordingly, the Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and, therefore, permission to proceed in forma pauperis for purposes of appeal is denied, and this case is closed. Dated: New York, New York
December 3, 2020
RUBY J. KRAJICK
Clerk of Court
BY: /s/ _________
Deputy Clerk