From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walker v. Doe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Sep 10, 2020
20-CV-5476 (LLS) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 10, 2020)

Opinion

20-CV-5476 (LLS)

09-10-2020

JUNARIAN WALKER, Plaintiff, v. CORRECTION OFFICER JOHN DOE, Defendant.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL :

By order dated July 30, 2020, the Court dismissed Plaintiff's claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and declined under 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c), to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's state law claims. The Court directed the Clerk of Court to hold the matter open on the docket for 30 days to permit Plaintiff to file an amended complaint. That order specified that failure to comply would result in the Court entering judgment dismissing the complaint. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, the Court dismisses Plaintiff's claims brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and declines under 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c), to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over his state law claims

The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. SO ORDERED. Dated: September 10, 2020

New York, New York

/s/_________

Louis L. Stanton

U.S.D.J.


Summaries of

Walker v. Doe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Sep 10, 2020
20-CV-5476 (LLS) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 10, 2020)
Case details for

Walker v. Doe

Case Details

Full title:JUNARIAN WALKER, Plaintiff, v. CORRECTION OFFICER JOHN DOE, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Sep 10, 2020

Citations

20-CV-5476 (LLS) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 10, 2020)

Citing Cases

Harvey v. Neusantz

In contrast, the mere negligence of a defendant official is insufficient to support a claim of a federal…