From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walker v. Davis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 7, 2013
Civ.S. 12-1882 GGH (E.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2013)

Opinion

Civ.S. 12-1882 GGH

02-07-2013

TAMEKCA WALKER, Petitioner, v. RON DAVIS, Warden, Respondent.

Krista Hart Attorney at Law Attorney for Petitioner


Krista Hart
Attorney at Law
Attorney for Petitioner

ORDER RE: JOINT

SCHEDULING STATEMENT

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING within 90 days from the date of this order petitioner shall file either: (1) a statement indicating petitioner will stand on the existing petition, and supplemental memorandum of points and authorities, if any; (2) an amended petition which will proceed on exhausted claims only; or (3) an amended petition which identifies both exhausted and unexhausted claims.

The undersigned does not have sufficient knowledge of the circumstances surrounding any new claims to determine whether this stipulation would prejudice the presentation of new claims because of the AEDPA limitations period. Counsel should keep this in mind in using the entire period requested.

Gregory G. Hollows

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Walker v. Davis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 7, 2013
Civ.S. 12-1882 GGH (E.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2013)
Case details for

Walker v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:TAMEKCA WALKER, Petitioner, v. RON DAVIS, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 7, 2013

Citations

Civ.S. 12-1882 GGH (E.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2013)