Walker v. Clark

Full title: CHARLES E. WALKER, Petitioner, v. KEN CLARK, Warden, Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Apr 20, 2010

CV 08-5587-CJC (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 20, 2010)

Opinion

CHARLES E. WALKER, Petitioner, v. KEN CLARK, Warden, Respondent. No. CV 08-5587-CJC (JEM). United States District Court, C.D. California. April 20, 2010.

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

          CORMAC J. CARNEY, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has filed Objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the Court has made a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Petitioner has objected. The Court concurs with and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the First Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied; (2) and Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action with prejudice.