From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walker v. City of Aurora

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jun 8, 2012
Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-01242-DME-CBS (D. Colo. Jun. 8, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-01242-DME-CBS

06-08-2012

DAVID WALKER, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF AURORA, a municipality, Defendant.


ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

This matter comes before the Court on the parties' Stipulated Motion for Dismissal with Prejudice. (Doc. 56.) As grounds the parties state that they have reached a resolution of the matter. The motion is GRANTED. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice, each side to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees.

BY THE COURT:

David M. Ebel

U. S. CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE


Summaries of

Walker v. City of Aurora

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jun 8, 2012
Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-01242-DME-CBS (D. Colo. Jun. 8, 2012)
Case details for

Walker v. City of Aurora

Case Details

Full title:DAVID WALKER, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF AURORA, a municipality, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Jun 8, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-01242-DME-CBS (D. Colo. Jun. 8, 2012)

Citing Cases

Sanitary Dist. of Chicago v. Chicago Packing Co.

In my opinion, in so far as the Sanitary District Act provides for the carrying off and disposal of the…

In re Petition to Levy Special Assessment

Furthermore, an assessment on the basis of frontage is not invalid if the special benefits are in proportion…