From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walker v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 22, 2010
366 F. App'x 459 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 09-2358.

Submitted: February 10, 2010.

Decided: February 22, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:09-cv-00035-RJC-DCK).

Dequilla Walker, Appellant Pro Se.Mary H. Crosby, Keith Michael Weddington, Parker, Poe, Adams Bernstein, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before GREGORY and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Dequilla Walker appeals a district court order and judgment dismissing her complaint against the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools. We have reviewed the record and the opinion and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. See Walker v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools, No. 3:09-cv-00035-RJC-DCK, 2009 WL 3762971 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 9, 2009). We also find the magistrate judge did not abuse his discretion in denying Walker's motion to amend the complaint. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Walker v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 22, 2010
366 F. App'x 459 (4th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

Walker v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools

Case Details

Full title:Dequilla WALKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG SCHOOLS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Feb 22, 2010

Citations

366 F. App'x 459 (4th Cir. 2010)